Growth and Fitness through Innovation
How to augment the returns from your stake


 

 

 

© Klaus G. Saul

 

 

 

 

1. Advance to grow

 

New insight into the phenomena of innovation has been obtained by a thorough analysis of the irreversible behaviour in complex systems.
As a result there now is a new perception of the human impact on the variables depicting growth in the macroscopic world.
It is shown how stakeholders can facilitate or accelerate the progressive change. Their impact manifests in an accelerated progress, a re-enforced importance of the intangible assets and an increasing interconnectivity of emerging new order parameters.

 

1-1
The use of the word innovation is connected with considerable confusion. There are numerous people addressing any novel product or service as an innovation regardless whether it adds socio-economic value or not. But more than 99% of those ”pseudo”-innovative ideas are not worth the investment. They fail [EXHIBIT 1] without generating pertinent returns.

Therefore and for reasons of thorough analysis we are concerned with the original meaning of the word, coined by the famous scientist Joseph Alois Schumpeter (1883-1950). Schumpeter’s revolutionary ideas can be learned from [EXHIBIT-2]

1-2
Unfortunately the competitive advantages of innovations are transient. For there are always competitors eager to invest into better problem solutions. They imitate the pioneering innovators and try to pass them by means of established network externalities, learning curves, specific expertise, skills, economies of scale or scope and the like to meet the preferences of the markets better.

1-3
The resulting competition causes prices to drop. They can decay until they hit the bottom line of the marginal costs of the innovatively improved production {Heuss, E. (1965)}. When that state has been reached it does no longer matter who had paid the bill to get there.

1-4
The transition from the original steady state to the more stable one produces macroscopic value  [EXHIBIT-3] as has been described by Kurt Hornschild {Hornschild, K. (1998)}. The amount of the macroscopic value is an indicator for the attractiveness of the new state. It tells something, too, about the number of paths leading to that new state. Most of these paths require investment for their activation. Some even allow investors to capture considerable returns on the investment. But anyhow, creative entrepreneurs can facilitate and accelerate the value creating transition by selecting most appropriate paths. If they are smart enough to select those which preserve their own competitive advantages [EXHIBIT-4] they may even control the entire competitive battle field up to the end of the tranistion.

1-5
As soon as the attracting new steady state is attained the advantages of the innovation are accessible to everybody almost free of charge. The initial vision has transformed into a public good and the former competitive advantages are irreversibly gone .

1-6
To better understand the irreversible feature of the transition it is useful to look into the structure of the underlying complex system [EXHIBIT-5 ]. It builds upon the ”Maximum Information (or Entropy) Principle” (MIP) introduced by Jaynes and later extensively elaborated by Hermann Haken {Haken, H. (2000)}. The MIP has proven to be very powerful in describing  self-organising complex systems from in particular statistical physics, thermodynamics, biology, sociology and the economy. It is fundamental and allows to derive new types of autopoietic variables that describe the growth in the macroscopic world.

1-7
Evidently one of these continuously growing variables is the macroscopic value of [EXHIBIT-3] itself. Another is associated with the human civilisation [EXHIBIT-6]; yet a third one is related to the capacity of the Earth’s resources [EXHIBIT-7] for the deployment of human activities while yet a further one is related to the ever growing fitness of the entire global ecosystem.

1-8
It seems incredible but today we live with approximately 6 billion fellow men together on a single planet Earth. Human life expectancy is about 75 years on the average. Not even thousand generations ago the Earth was completely overcrowded by 5 million people [EXHIBIT 7] having a life expectancy of five years on the average..

1-9
In those days our predecessors had not yet elaborated the quality of life to the extent of the present world. But without their innovative creativity 99.9% of our fellow men would not have had an opportunity for a humane existence. Without the progress they have induced there would be none to read these lines, let alone to grasp them.

1-10
The following six chapters are focused on the identification and the optimization of the control parameter "alpha" in equation (4.2) of [EXHIBIT-5]. We start by identifying the essence of meaningful information. We shall perceive the progressive change and the evolution in the Darwinian world as growth of information carrying meaning for living matter. We shall further  learn that much of the anthropogenic progressive change means overcoming the boundary conditions of the actual human existence.

In the third chapter we shall familiarise ourselves with new approaches to identifying promising transitory paths. By analysis and comparison of different business cases with lessons learned from the recent past we shall enable ourselves to identify the winning concepts for progress with a 75-80% reliability.

In the forth chapter we shall learn from a decision tree analysis what the the optimum control parameter "alpha" looks like. It will be shown that this, indeed, is the optimum "alpha" which allows the leading stakeholders to retain a maximum competitive advantage during the entire transition.

The fifth chapter is to familiarise the reader with innovation opportunities by means of "critical masses" generated as a result of preceding innovations. The insight will shed new light on the idea of Schumpeter on "co-innovations".

The sixth chapter takes into account modern flexible management tools. With this re-eneforced understanding innovations will no longer be perceived as ”bets on an unknown future”. On the contrary and in the light of the new economy the unknown future enables most flexible stakeholders to run evolutionary innovations along the Black-Scholes model and capture real option opportunities.

The seventh and final chapter is to exorcise all strategically unreasonable bias. It will be seen why stakeholders are well advised to pursue an efficient sharing of tasks among symbiotically co-operating competent partners.


LITERATURE

  1. Cooper, R.G. (1993) “The NewProd Model” (2nd edition, Addison-Wesley)
  2. Cooper, R.G. et al. (1998) Portfolio Managem. for New Prod. (Perseus Books, Reading, Mass. USA)
  3. Fukuyama, F. (1992) The End of History and the Last Man (Penguin Books Ltd, London)
  4. Fukuyama, F. (1999) The Great Disruption (Profile Books Ltd, London)
  5. Gabler Wirtschaftslexikon, 14. Auflage, 1997 (Verlag Dr. Th. Gabler GmbH)
  6. Group of Lisbon (1995) Limits of Competition (Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press)
  7. Haken,H. (2000) Information and Self-Organization (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New york)
  8. Heuss, E. (1965) Allgemeine Markttheorie (Tübingen, J.C.B. Mohr)
  9. HIS (2000) Public Private Partnership in der Forschung (HIS GmbH Hannover 2000)
  10. Hornschild, K.(1998) Beiträge zur Strukturforschung, Heft 172 (Berlin, Duncker & Humblot)
  11. Kleinschmidt, E. et al. (1996) Erfolgsfaktor Markt (Springer Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg)
  12. Luria, S.E. et al. (1981) A view of Life (Menlo Park, CAL.; Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co)
  13. Ludwig, K.P. et al. (1998) Innovation & Raumfahrt (Bonn, DGLR-Synthesepaier)
  14. Magee, J. (1964) How to Use Decision Trees in Capital Investment (Harvard Business Review Sept.-Oct.)
  15. Markl, H. (1998) Wissenschaft gegen Zukunftsangst (München – Wien Hanser Verlag)
  16. McKelvey, M.D. (1996) Evolutionary Innovations (Oxford University Press)
  17. Popp, W. (1988) Zur Planung von F&E-Projekten. (Die Betriebswirtschaft 6, S. 735-749)
  18. Popp, W. (1999) Neue Horizonte bei Innovationsanalysen (Wissenschaftsmanagement Heft Nr. 2, Ausg. April/März 1999; Lemmens Verlags-  & Medien-GmbH 53227 Bonn)
  19. Russel, B.(1927) An Outline of Philosophy (London p.27)
  20. Schumpeter, J.A. (1911) Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung (Nachdruck Berlin 1964)
  21. Saul, K.G. (1999) Leitbegriff “Innovation” Fachgespr. der Eur. Akademie (Bad Neuenahr- Ahrweiler, Sept. 1999)
  22. Shannon,C.E. (1948) A Mathematical Theory of Communication (Bell System Techn. J.27,370-423, 623-656)
  23. Simon, H.A. (1993) Homo rationalis (Campus Verlag Frankfurt/New York)
  24. Witt, U. (1998), Economics and Darwinism (Jena, Schriftenreihe MPI for Research into Economic Systems)
  25. Zink, K.J. (1995) TQM als integratives Managementkonzept (Carl Hanser Verlag München, Wien)

klaus.jpg (17071 Byte)

Dr. Klaus G. SAUL; Leiter Fachausschuss S1.3 INNOVATIONSMANAGEMENT
DEUTSCHE GESELLSCHAFT FÜR LUFT- UND RAUMFAHRT - LILIENTHAL- OBERT e.V. (DGLR)    53175 Bonn


<= Go back

Discussion-Forum

Continue =>